Message ID | 20180906035628.9813-1-wens@csie.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 792b204798453d96b00e0817e8472c19455e92a2 |
Delegated to: | Tom Rini |
Headers | show |
Series | [U-Boot] ARM: Specify aligned address for secure section instead of using attributes | expand |
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:56:28AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > In commit a1274cc94a20 ("ARM: Page align secure section only when it is > executed in situ"), we used output section attributes (the "ALIGN" > keyword after the colon) to specify the alignment requirements. Using > the constant "COMMONPAGE" there was recently broken in binutils 2.31 [1]. > > Binutils maintainer Alan Modra suggested the former method would still > work. Since both methods achieve the same result, this patch does just > that. This fixes the "reboot after bootm" issue we've been seeing on > sunxi when booting non-secure. > > [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23571 > > Suggested-by: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> After a little more time for review, should I take this directly or a PR from the sunxi team? Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:56:28AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> In commit a1274cc94a20 ("ARM: Page align secure section only when it is >> executed in situ"), we used output section attributes (the "ALIGN" >> keyword after the colon) to specify the alignment requirements. Using >> the constant "COMMONPAGE" there was recently broken in binutils 2.31 [1]. >> >> Binutils maintainer Alan Modra suggested the former method would still >> work. Since both methods achieve the same result, this patch does just >> that. This fixes the "reboot after bootm" issue we've been seeing on >> sunxi when booting non-secure. >> >> [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23571 >> >> Suggested-by: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> Acked-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com> > > After a little more time for review, should I take this directly or a PR > from the sunxi team? Thanks! As of now, I don't have any patches for the release please take it directly.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:56:28AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > In commit a1274cc94a20 ("ARM: Page align secure section only when it is > executed in situ"), we used output section attributes (the "ALIGN" > keyword after the colon) to specify the alignment requirements. Using > the constant "COMMONPAGE" there was recently broken in binutils 2.31 [1]. > > Binutils maintainer Alan Modra suggested the former method would still > work. Since both methods achieve the same result, this patch does just > that. This fixes the "reboot after bootm" issue we've been seeing on > sunxi when booting non-secure. > > [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23571 > > Suggested-by: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> > Acked-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@openedev.com> Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds index 834dc99554c9..0eb164d2e694 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds @@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ SECTIONS #ifdef CONFIG_ARMV7_NONSEC /* Align the secure section only if we're going to use it in situ */ - .__secure_start : + .__secure_start #ifndef CONFIG_ARMV7_SECURE_BASE ALIGN(CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE)) #endif - { + : { KEEP(*(.__secure_start)) }
In commit a1274cc94a20 ("ARM: Page align secure section only when it is executed in situ"), we used output section attributes (the "ALIGN" keyword after the colon) to specify the alignment requirements. Using the constant "COMMONPAGE" there was recently broken in binutils 2.31 [1]. Binutils maintainer Alan Modra suggested the former method would still work. Since both methods achieve the same result, this patch does just that. This fixes the "reboot after bootm" issue we've been seeing on sunxi when booting non-secure. [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23571 Suggested-by: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> --- arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)