Message ID | 1531397598-11207-3-git-send-email-valex@mellanox.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | John Linville |
Headers | show |
Series | devlink: Add support for region access | expand |
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:13:09 +0300, Alex Vesker wrote: > To restrict the driver with the snapshot ID selection a new callback > is introduced for the driver to get the snapshot ID before creating > a new snapshot. This will also allow giving the same ID for multiple > snapshots taken of different regions on the same time. I'm not in position to criticize other people's commit messages :), but I find this one hard to parse. I think what you meant to say is that you add a helper for numbering the snapshot per-devlink instance. There is no callback to be seen here. You *prevent* from giving the same ID to multiple snapshot even if they are from different regions. > diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c > index cac8561..6c92ddd 100644 > --- a/net/core/devlink.c > +++ b/net/core/devlink.c > @@ -4193,6 +4193,27 @@ void devlink_region_destroy(struct devlink_region *region) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_region_destroy); > > +/** > + * devlink_region_shapshot_id_get - get snapshot ID > + * > + * This callback should be called when adding a new snapshot, > + * Driver should use the same id for multiple snapshots taken > + * on multiple regions at the same time/by the same trigger. > + * > + * @devlink: devlink > + */ > +u32 devlink_region_shapshot_id_get(struct devlink *devlink) > +{ > + u32 id; > + > + mutex_lock(&devlink->lock); > + id = ++devlink->snapshot_id; Any reason not to use an IDA? The reuse may seem unlikely, OTOH IDA isn't going to cost much, so why risk it... > + mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock); > + > + return id; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_region_shapshot_id_get); Sorry for only spotting this now.
On 7/13/2018 3:51 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:13:09 +0300, Alex Vesker wrote: >> To restrict the driver with the snapshot ID selection a new callback >> is introduced for the driver to get the snapshot ID before creating >> a new snapshot. This will also allow giving the same ID for multiple >> snapshots taken of different regions on the same time. > I'm not in position to criticize other people's commit messages :), but > I find this one hard to parse. I think what you meant to say is that > you add a helper for numbering the snapshot per-devlink instance. > There is no callback to be seen here. You *prevent* from giving the > same ID to multiple snapshot even if they are from different regions. Let me try to clarify, The idea is to have a simple helper function that assigns IDs to provide a more complete API, an example use case is when you want to add a new snapshot to multiple regions from the same trigger, then it should be called once to get an ID, this ID should be used on all new snapshots. >> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c >> index cac8561..6c92ddd 100644 >> --- a/net/core/devlink.c >> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c >> @@ -4193,6 +4193,27 @@ void devlink_region_destroy(struct devlink_region *region) >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_region_destroy); >> >> +/** >> + * devlink_region_shapshot_id_get - get snapshot ID >> + * >> + * This callback should be called when adding a new snapshot, >> + * Driver should use the same id for multiple snapshots taken >> + * on multiple regions at the same time/by the same trigger. >> + * >> + * @devlink: devlink >> + */ >> +u32 devlink_region_shapshot_id_get(struct devlink *devlink) >> +{ >> + u32 id; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&devlink->lock); >> + id = ++devlink->snapshot_id; > Any reason not to use an IDA? The reuse may seem unlikely, OTOH IDA > isn't going to cost much, so why risk it... As you mentioned more than u32_max_value snapshots doesn't sound likely. New snapshots will be created, old snapshots should be deleted by the user a wrap around sounds unlikely. Let me think about it some more, might send a patch that changes to IDA. >> + mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock); >> + >> + return id; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_region_shapshot_id_get); > Sorry for only spotting this now.
diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h index e539765..f27d859 100644 --- a/include/net/devlink.h +++ b/include/net/devlink.h @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct devlink { struct list_head resource_list; struct list_head param_list; struct list_head region_list; + u32 snapshot_id; struct devlink_dpipe_headers *dpipe_headers; const struct devlink_ops *ops; struct device *dev; @@ -551,6 +552,7 @@ struct devlink_region *devlink_region_create(struct devlink *devlink, u32 region_max_snapshots, u64 region_size); void devlink_region_destroy(struct devlink_region *region); +u32 devlink_region_shapshot_id_get(struct devlink *devlink); #else @@ -792,6 +794,12 @@ static inline bool devlink_dpipe_table_counter_enabled(struct devlink *devlink, { } +static inline u32 +devlink_region_shapshot_id_get(struct devlink *devlink) +{ + return 0; +} + #endif #endif /* _NET_DEVLINK_H_ */ diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c index cac8561..6c92ddd 100644 --- a/net/core/devlink.c +++ b/net/core/devlink.c @@ -4193,6 +4193,27 @@ void devlink_region_destroy(struct devlink_region *region) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_region_destroy); +/** + * devlink_region_shapshot_id_get - get snapshot ID + * + * This callback should be called when adding a new snapshot, + * Driver should use the same id for multiple snapshots taken + * on multiple regions at the same time/by the same trigger. + * + * @devlink: devlink + */ +u32 devlink_region_shapshot_id_get(struct devlink *devlink) +{ + u32 id; + + mutex_lock(&devlink->lock); + id = ++devlink->snapshot_id; + mutex_unlock(&devlink->lock); + + return id; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_region_shapshot_id_get); + static int __init devlink_module_init(void) { return genl_register_family(&devlink_nl_family);