diff mbox series

[2/3] bluetooth: hci_ll: add constant for vendor-specific command

Message ID 1512357682-8911-3-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com
State Awaiting Upstream, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show
Series bluetooth: hci_ll: Get MAC address from NVMEM | expand

Commit Message

David Lechner Dec. 4, 2017, 3:21 a.m. UTC
This adds a #define for the vendor-specific HCI command to set the
baudrate instead of using the bare 0xff36 multiple times.

Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Marcel Holtmann Dec. 4, 2017, 6:23 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi David,

> This adds a #define for the vendor-specific HCI command to set the
> baudrate instead of using the bare 0xff36 multiple times.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel
David Lechner Dec. 7, 2017, 9:29 p.m. UTC | #2
On 12/04/2017 12:23 AM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
>> This adds a #define for the vendor-specific HCI command to set the
>> baudrate instead of using the bare 0xff36 multiple times.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.
> 

I am new to the bluetooth tree, so just to be sure... does this mean I 
should not include this patch in v2 of this series since this patch has 
been applied?
Marcel Holtmann Dec. 7, 2017, 9:43 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi David,

>>> This adds a #define for the vendor-specific HCI command to set the
>>> baudrate instead of using the bare 0xff36 multiple times.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree.
> 
> I am new to the bluetooth tree, so just to be sure... does this mean I should not include this patch in v2 of this series since this patch has been applied?

please don’t include already applied patches. Base everything against bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c
index 447abea..974a788 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ll.c
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ 
 
 #include "hci_uart.h"
 
+/* Vendor-specific HCI commands */
+#define HCI_VS_UPDATE_UART_HCI_BAUDRATE		0xff36
+
 /* HCILL commands */
 #define HCILL_GO_TO_SLEEP_IND	0x30
 #define HCILL_GO_TO_SLEEP_ACK	0x31
@@ -620,7 +623,7 @@  static int download_firmware(struct ll_device *lldev)
 		case ACTION_SEND_COMMAND:	/* action send */
 			bt_dev_dbg(lldev->hu.hdev, "S");
 			cmd = (struct hci_command *)action_ptr;
-			if (cmd->opcode == 0xff36) {
+			if (cmd->opcode == HCI_VS_UPDATE_UART_HCI_BAUDRATE) {
 				/* ignore remote change
 				 * baud rate HCI VS command
 				 */
@@ -704,7 +707,10 @@  static int ll_setup(struct hci_uart *hu)
 		speed = 0;
 
 	if (speed) {
-		struct sk_buff *skb = __hci_cmd_sync(hu->hdev, 0xff36, sizeof(speed), &speed, HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT);
+		struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+		skb = __hci_cmd_sync(hu->hdev, HCI_VS_UPDATE_UART_HCI_BAUDRATE,
+				     sizeof(speed), &speed, HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT);
 		if (!IS_ERR(skb)) {
 			kfree_skb(skb);
 			serdev_device_set_baudrate(serdev, speed);