| Message ID | 20170328154217.5405-1-krzk@kernel.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Hi Lee, > > > This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski. > That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij. This does not work, and *may* still break. The only way to guarantee the order of the patches is to have them *all* as part of the pull-request. Not just some of them. > The following changes since commit c1ae3cfa0e89fa1a7ecc4c99031f5e9ae99d9201: > > Linux 4.11-rc1 (2017-03-05 12:59:56 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pinctrl/samsung.git tags/samsung-pinctrl-retention-4.12 > > for you to fetch changes up to e1d7eb0c8fc9c33ef60ac31172fb0fbb78c24271: > > pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs (2017-03-23 21:07:02 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Add retention control to Exynos5433 pinctrl driver, necessary for proper > handling of runtime Power Management of Exynos Audio SubSystem and effectively > allowing to power down the domain. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Marek Szyprowski (2): > pinctrl: samsung: Ensure that pad retention is disabled on driver init > pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs > > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> >> Hi Lee, >> >> >> This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski. >> That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij. > > This does not work, and *may* still break. > > The only way to guarantee the order of the patches is to have them > *all* as part of the pull-request. Not just some of them. What do you mean exactly? If these two patches come through my tree first, then everything will work fine because they do not break any other stuff. If you pull it and apply the rest on top, then it should also work without problems because your history will contain everything needed in proper order. In both cases bisectability is preserved. Did I missed something? Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi Lee, > >> > >> > >> This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski. > >> That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij. > > > > This does not work, and *may* still break. > > > > The only way to guarantee the order of the patches is to have them > > *all* as part of the pull-request. Not just some of them. > > What do you mean exactly? If these two patches come through my tree > first, then everything will work fine because they do not break any > other stuff. > > If you pull it and apply the rest on top, then it should also work > without problems because your history will contain everything needed > in proper order. > > In both cases bisectability is preserved. Did I missed something? Okay, so you're suggesting that I rebase MFD *on-top* of your PR. That does work for me because I insist on being able to re-work my tree at any time. However, be aware that some Maintainers do not work this way, thus *normally* you will have to send PR containing all of the dependant patches.
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:50:54AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Hi Lee, > > >> > > >> > > >> This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski. > > >> That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij. > > > > > > This does not work, and *may* still break. > > > > > > The only way to guarantee the order of the patches is to have them > > > *all* as part of the pull-request. Not just some of them. > > > > What do you mean exactly? If these two patches come through my tree > > first, then everything will work fine because they do not break any > > other stuff. > > > > If you pull it and apply the rest on top, then it should also work > > without problems because your history will contain everything needed > > in proper order. > > > > In both cases bisectability is preserved. Did I missed something? > > Okay, so you're suggesting that I rebase MFD *on-top* of your PR. That > does work for me because I insist on being able to re-work my tree at > any time. However, be aware that some Maintainers do not work this > way, thus *normally* you will have to send PR containing all of the > dependant patches. You could either rebased on top of this PR or merge it before applying rest of patches. It does not matter because in both cases all dependant patches will be after the dependency. Also in both cases you will be sending them in your PR. You can then rebase your stuff as well, keeping only the external commits untouced and merged. Really, that does not differ from all your stable immutable branches you have been providing for other folks. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:50:54AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Hi Lee, > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski. > > > >> That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij. > > > > > > > > This does not work, and *may* still break. > > > > > > > > The only way to guarantee the order of the patches is to have them > > > > *all* as part of the pull-request. Not just some of them. > > > > > > What do you mean exactly? If these two patches come through my tree > > > first, then everything will work fine because they do not break any > > > other stuff. > > > > > > If you pull it and apply the rest on top, then it should also work > > > without problems because your history will contain everything needed > > > in proper order. > > > > > > In both cases bisectability is preserved. Did I missed something? > > > > Okay, so you're suggesting that I rebase MFD *on-top* of your PR. That > > does work for me because I insist on being able to re-work my tree at > > any time. However, be aware that some Maintainers do not work this > > way, thus *normally* you will have to send PR containing all of the > > dependant patches. > > You could either rebased on top of this PR or merge it before applying > rest of patches. It does not matter because in both cases all dependant > patches will be after the dependency. Also in both cases you will be > sending them in your PR. > > You can then rebase your stuff as well, keeping only the external > commits untouced and merged. Right. As I say, it does work for me because I always rebase MFD patches on-top of the immutable branches. What time trying to say is that, some Maintainers treat their master branches as stable once they get pushed, so this style of "pull this and apply it as a base for patches already in your tree" pull-request will not work for some. > Really, that does not differ from all your stable immutable branches you > have been providing for other folks. No, this is different. When I create a pull-request it always contains *all* of the dependencies, so it can be pulled in before or after any other patches.
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Hi Lee, > > > This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski. > That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > > > The following changes since commit c1ae3cfa0e89fa1a7ecc4c99031f5e9ae99d9201: > > Linux 4.11-rc1 (2017-03-05 12:59:56 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pinctrl/samsung.git tags/samsung-pinctrl-retention-4.12 > > for you to fetch changes up to e1d7eb0c8fc9c33ef60ac31172fb0fbb78c24271: > > pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs (2017-03-23 21:07:02 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Add retention control to Exynos5433 pinctrl driver, necessary for proper > handling of runtime Power Management of Exynos Audio SubSystem and effectively > allowing to power down the domain. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Marek Szyprowski (2): > pinctrl: samsung: Ensure that pad retention is disabled on driver init > pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs > > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+) Pulled into MFD -next.
Hi Lee, This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski. That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij. Best regards, Krzysztof The following changes since commit c1ae3cfa0e89fa1a7ecc4c99031f5e9ae99d9201: Linux 4.11-rc1 (2017-03-05 12:59:56 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pinctrl/samsung.git tags/samsung-pinctrl-retention-4.12 for you to fetch changes up to e1d7eb0c8fc9c33ef60ac31172fb0fbb78c24271: pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs (2017-03-23 21:07:02 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Add retention control to Exynos5433 pinctrl driver, necessary for proper handling of runtime Power Management of Exynos Audio SubSystem and effectively allowing to power down the domain. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Marek Szyprowski (2): pinctrl: samsung: Ensure that pad retention is disabled on driver init pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html