[v3,2/2] net: ethernet: nb8800: handle all RGMII definitions

Commit a999589ccaae ("phylib: add RGMII-ID interface mode definition")
and commit 7d400a4c5897 ("phylib: add PHY interface modes for internal
delay for tx and rx only") added several RGMII definitions:
PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID, PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID and
PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID to deal with internal delays.

Those are all RGMII modes (1Gbit) and must be considered that way when
setting the MAC mode or the pad mode for the HW to work properly.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> writes:

> Commit a999589ccaae ("phylib: add RGMII-ID interface mode definition")
> and commit 7d400a4c5897 ("phylib: add PHY interface modes for internal
> delay for tx and rx only") added several RGMII definitions:
> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID, PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID and
> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID to deal with internal delays.
>
> Those are all RGMII modes (1Gbit) and must be considered that way when
> setting the MAC mode or the pad mode for the HW to work properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
> index d2855c9..fba2699 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
> @@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nb8800_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  static void nb8800_mac_config(struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct nb8800_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct phy_device *phydev = dev->phydev;
>  	bool gigabit = priv->speed == SPEED_1000;
>  	u32 mac_mode_mask = RGMII_MODE | HALF_DUPLEX | GMAC_MODE;
>  	u32 mac_mode = 0;
> @@ -609,7 +610,7 @@ static void nb8800_mac_config(struct net_device *dev)
>  		mac_mode |= HALF_DUPLEX;
>
>  	if (gigabit) {
> -		if (priv->phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII)
> +		if (phy_interface_is_rgmii(phydev))
>  			mac_mode |= RGMII_MODE;
>
>  		mac_mode |= GMAC_MODE;

As I said before, this part can/should be applied separately, although
personally I probably wouldn't have bothered adding a single-use variable.

> @@ -1278,9 +1279,8 @@ static int nb8800_tangox_init(struct net_device *dev)
>  		break;
>
>  	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> -		pad_mode = PAD_MODE_RGMII;
> -		break;
> -
> +	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
> +	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
>  	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
>  		pad_mode = PAD_MODE_RGMII;
>  		break;
> -- 
> 1.7.11.2
>

Hi Måns,

On 11/05/2016 01:58 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>  	if (gigabit) {
>> -		if (priv->phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII)
>> +		if (phy_interface_is_rgmii(phydev))
>>  			mac_mode |= RGMII_MODE;
>>
>>  		mac_mode |= GMAC_MODE;
> 
> As I said before, this part can/should be applied separately, although
> personally I probably wouldn't have bothered adding a single-use variable.

It was for consistency with other functions that use 'phydev', but I don't
mind making the changes.

Just to be clear, when you say "can/should be applied separately", do you
mean that this patch should not be part of a series, and that I should split
the series into separate patches?

Best regards,

Sebastian

Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net> writes:

> Hi Måns,
>
> On 11/05/2016 01:58 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>>>  	if (gigabit) {
>>> -		if (priv->phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII)
>>> +		if (phy_interface_is_rgmii(phydev))
>>>  			mac_mode |= RGMII_MODE;
>>>
>>>  		mac_mode |= GMAC_MODE;
>> 
>> As I said before, this part can/should be applied separately, although
>> personally I probably wouldn't have bothered adding a single-use variable.
>
> It was for consistency with other functions that use 'phydev', but I don't
> mind making the changes.
>
> Just to be clear, when you say "can/should be applied separately", do you
> mean that this patch should not be part of a series, and that I should split
> the series into separate patches?

I meant that this change should be made regardless of the others and can
be done separately if desired.