Message ID | 20160610104919.479B340176C1C@oldenburg.str.redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 06/10/2016 06:49 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > 2016-06-10 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> > > [BZ #20222] > * libio/iofopncook.c (_IO_cookie_read): Demangle callback pointer. > (_IO_cookie_write): Likewise. > (_IO_cookie_seek): Likewise. > (_IO_cookie_close): Likewise. > (_IO_old_cookie_seek): Likewise. > (set_callbacks): New function. > (_IO_cookie_init): Call set_callbacks to copy callbacks. A couple of questions... > diff --git a/libio/iofopncook.c b/libio/iofopncook.c > index 9eda7c1..487297c 100644 > --- a/libio/iofopncook.c > +++ b/libio/iofopncook.c > @@ -43,25 +43,29 @@ static _IO_ssize_t > _IO_cookie_read (_IO_FILE *fp, void *buf, _IO_ssize_t size) > { > struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; > + cookie_read_function_t *read_cb = cfile->__io_functions.read; > + PTR_DEMANGLE (read_cb); > > - if (cfile->__io_functions.read == NULL) > + if (read_cb == NULL) > return -1; > > - return cfile->__io_functions.read (cfile->__cookie, buf, size); > + return read_cb (cfile->__cookie, buf, size); > } > > static _IO_ssize_t > _IO_cookie_write (_IO_FILE *fp, const void *buf, _IO_ssize_t size) > { > struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; > + cookie_write_function_t *write_cb = cfile->__io_functions.write; > + PTR_DEMANGLE (write_cb); > > - if (cfile->__io_functions.write == NULL) > + if (write_cb == NULL) > { > fp->_flags |= _IO_ERR_SEEN; > return 0; > } > > - _IO_ssize_t n = cfile->__io_functions.write (cfile->__cookie, buf, size); > + _IO_ssize_t n = write_cb (cfile->__cookie, buf, size); > if (n < size) > fp->_flags |= _IO_ERR_SEEN; > > @@ -72,9 +76,11 @@ static _IO_off64_t > _IO_cookie_seek (_IO_FILE *fp, _IO_off64_t offset, int dir) > { > struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; > + cookie_seek_function_t *seek_cb = cfile->__io_functions.seek; > + PTR_DEMANGLE (seek_cb); > > - return ((cfile->__io_functions.seek == NULL > - || (cfile->__io_functions.seek (cfile->__cookie, &offset, dir) > + return ((seek_cb == NULL > + || (seek_cb (cfile->__cookie, &offset, dir) > == -1) > || offset == (_IO_off64_t) -1) > ? _IO_pos_BAD : offset); > @@ -84,11 +90,13 @@ static int > _IO_cookie_close (_IO_FILE *fp) > { > struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; > + cookie_close_function_t *close_cb = cfile->__io_functions.close; > + PTR_DEMANGLE (close_cb); > > - if (cfile->__io_functions.close == NULL) > + if (close_cb == NULL) > return 0; > > - return cfile->__io_functions.close (cfile->__cookie); > + return close_cb (cfile->__cookie); > } > > > @@ -126,6 +134,19 @@ static const struct _IO_jump_t _IO_cookie_jumps = { > }; > > > +/* Copy the callbacks from SOURCE to *TARGET, with pointer > + mangling. */ > +static void > +set_callbacks (_IO_cookie_io_functions_t *target, > + _IO_cookie_io_functions_t source) > +{ > + PTR_MANGLE (source.read); > + PTR_MANGLE (source.write); > + PTR_MANGLE (source.seek); > + PTR_MANGLE (source.close); Isn't this modifying the user's copy of the callbacks passed in during the call to fopencookie? If it is, then that might be unexpected. I expect that we need to copy the function pointers and then encrypt them. Leaving the users copy untouched. In fact I'd go as far to say that stdio-common/tst-cookie.c should be modified to verify that 'cookie_io_functions_t fcts' is unmodified after the call to fopencookie. > + *target = source; > +} > + > void > _IO_cookie_init (struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile, int read_write, > void *cookie, _IO_cookie_io_functions_t io_functions) > @@ -134,7 +155,7 @@ _IO_cookie_init (struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile, int read_write, > _IO_JUMPS (&cfile->__fp) = &_IO_cookie_jumps; > > cfile->__cookie = cookie; > - cfile->__io_functions = io_functions; > + set_callbacks (&cfile->__io_functions, io_functions); > > _IO_file_init (&cfile->__fp); > > @@ -205,14 +226,14 @@ attribute_compat_text_section > _IO_old_cookie_seek (_IO_FILE *fp, _IO_off64_t offset, int dir) > { > struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; > - int (*seek) (_IO_FILE *, _IO_off_t, int); > - int ret; > + int (*seek_cb) (_IO_FILE *, _IO_off_t, int) > + = (int (*)(_IO_FILE *, _IO_off_t, int)) cfile->__io_functions.seek;; > + PTR_DEMANGLE (seek_cb); > > - seek = (int (*)(_IO_FILE *, _IO_off_t, int)) cfile->__io_functions.seek; > - if (seek == NULL) > + if (seek_cb == NULL) > return _IO_pos_BAD; > > - ret = seek (cfile->__cookie, offset, dir); > + int ret = seek_cb (cfile->__cookie, offset, dir); > > return (ret == -1) ? _IO_pos_BAD : ret; > } >
On 06/10/2016 05:55 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> +/* Copy the callbacks from SOURCE to *TARGET, with pointer >> + mangling. */ >> +static void >> +set_callbacks (_IO_cookie_io_functions_t *target, >> + _IO_cookie_io_functions_t source) >> +{ >> + PTR_MANGLE (source.read); >> + PTR_MANGLE (source.write); >> + PTR_MANGLE (source.seek); >> + PTR_MANGLE (source.close); > > Isn't this modifying the user's copy of the callbacks > passed in during the call to fopencookie? No, C function arguments are pass-by-value. It's not a pointer-to-struct, it's the struct object itself. Thanks, Florian
On 06/10/2016 11:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/10/2016 05:55 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >>> +/* Copy the callbacks from SOURCE to *TARGET, with pointer >>> + mangling. */ >>> +static void >>> +set_callbacks (_IO_cookie_io_functions_t *target, >>> + _IO_cookie_io_functions_t source) >>> +{ >>> + PTR_MANGLE (source.read); >>> + PTR_MANGLE (source.write); >>> + PTR_MANGLE (source.seek); >>> + PTR_MANGLE (source.close); >> >> Isn't this modifying the user's copy of the callbacks >> passed in during the call to fopencookie? > > No, C function arguments are pass-by-value. It's not a > pointer-to-struct, it's the struct object itself. Sorry yes, I misread that as pointer-to-struct. You are absolutely right, these are just struct copies being passed around so we don't care. Patch looks good to me then.
diff --git a/libio/iofopncook.c b/libio/iofopncook.c index 9eda7c1..487297c 100644 --- a/libio/iofopncook.c +++ b/libio/iofopncook.c @@ -43,25 +43,29 @@ static _IO_ssize_t _IO_cookie_read (_IO_FILE *fp, void *buf, _IO_ssize_t size) { struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; + cookie_read_function_t *read_cb = cfile->__io_functions.read; + PTR_DEMANGLE (read_cb); - if (cfile->__io_functions.read == NULL) + if (read_cb == NULL) return -1; - return cfile->__io_functions.read (cfile->__cookie, buf, size); + return read_cb (cfile->__cookie, buf, size); } static _IO_ssize_t _IO_cookie_write (_IO_FILE *fp, const void *buf, _IO_ssize_t size) { struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; + cookie_write_function_t *write_cb = cfile->__io_functions.write; + PTR_DEMANGLE (write_cb); - if (cfile->__io_functions.write == NULL) + if (write_cb == NULL) { fp->_flags |= _IO_ERR_SEEN; return 0; } - _IO_ssize_t n = cfile->__io_functions.write (cfile->__cookie, buf, size); + _IO_ssize_t n = write_cb (cfile->__cookie, buf, size); if (n < size) fp->_flags |= _IO_ERR_SEEN; @@ -72,9 +76,11 @@ static _IO_off64_t _IO_cookie_seek (_IO_FILE *fp, _IO_off64_t offset, int dir) { struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; + cookie_seek_function_t *seek_cb = cfile->__io_functions.seek; + PTR_DEMANGLE (seek_cb); - return ((cfile->__io_functions.seek == NULL - || (cfile->__io_functions.seek (cfile->__cookie, &offset, dir) + return ((seek_cb == NULL + || (seek_cb (cfile->__cookie, &offset, dir) == -1) || offset == (_IO_off64_t) -1) ? _IO_pos_BAD : offset); @@ -84,11 +90,13 @@ static int _IO_cookie_close (_IO_FILE *fp) { struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; + cookie_close_function_t *close_cb = cfile->__io_functions.close; + PTR_DEMANGLE (close_cb); - if (cfile->__io_functions.close == NULL) + if (close_cb == NULL) return 0; - return cfile->__io_functions.close (cfile->__cookie); + return close_cb (cfile->__cookie); } @@ -126,6 +134,19 @@ static const struct _IO_jump_t _IO_cookie_jumps = { }; +/* Copy the callbacks from SOURCE to *TARGET, with pointer + mangling. */ +static void +set_callbacks (_IO_cookie_io_functions_t *target, + _IO_cookie_io_functions_t source) +{ + PTR_MANGLE (source.read); + PTR_MANGLE (source.write); + PTR_MANGLE (source.seek); + PTR_MANGLE (source.close); + *target = source; +} + void _IO_cookie_init (struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile, int read_write, void *cookie, _IO_cookie_io_functions_t io_functions) @@ -134,7 +155,7 @@ _IO_cookie_init (struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile, int read_write, _IO_JUMPS (&cfile->__fp) = &_IO_cookie_jumps; cfile->__cookie = cookie; - cfile->__io_functions = io_functions; + set_callbacks (&cfile->__io_functions, io_functions); _IO_file_init (&cfile->__fp); @@ -205,14 +226,14 @@ attribute_compat_text_section _IO_old_cookie_seek (_IO_FILE *fp, _IO_off64_t offset, int dir) { struct _IO_cookie_file *cfile = (struct _IO_cookie_file *) fp; - int (*seek) (_IO_FILE *, _IO_off_t, int); - int ret; + int (*seek_cb) (_IO_FILE *, _IO_off_t, int) + = (int (*)(_IO_FILE *, _IO_off_t, int)) cfile->__io_functions.seek;; + PTR_DEMANGLE (seek_cb); - seek = (int (*)(_IO_FILE *, _IO_off_t, int)) cfile->__io_functions.seek; - if (seek == NULL) + if (seek_cb == NULL) return _IO_pos_BAD; - ret = seek (cfile->__cookie, offset, dir); + int ret = seek_cb (cfile->__cookie, offset, dir); return (ret == -1) ? _IO_pos_BAD : ret; }