Message ID | Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261756330.23743@ask.diku.dk |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:56:48 +0200 (CEST) > Add a spin_unlock missing on the error path. There seems like no reason > why the lock should continue to be held if the kzalloc fail. Applied, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c index c8b4599..9637e45 100644 --- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c +++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c @@ -1619,7 +1619,7 @@ static void iucv_callback_rx(struct iucv_path *path, struct iucv_message *msg) save_message: save_msg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sock_msg_q), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA); if (!save_msg) - return; + goto out_unlock; save_msg->path = path; save_msg->msg = *msg;