Message ID | 1449343948-14839-1-git-send-email-eric@nelint.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Tom Rini |
Headers | show |
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 12:32:28PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: > In order to support boot from multiple devices through board_boot_order, > it's necessary to use the block number of a device. > > The use of a hard-coded 0 for the device number also creates a need > to re-order block devices for use in SPL like this: > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c;hb=HEAD#l195 We also do similar'ish things for TI parts (we only register what we're booting from). So, before this can be applied don't we also need a patch for mx6slevk and for TI ones too (but that should be "easier" since I think it just becomes we always use the normal board_mmc_init) ? Thanks!
Hi Tom, On 12/13/2015 06:21 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 12:32:28PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: > >> In order to support boot from multiple devices through board_boot_order, >> it's necessary to use the block number of a device. >> >> The use of a hard-coded 0 for the device number also creates a need >> to re-order block devices for use in SPL like this: >> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c;hb=HEAD#l195 > > We also do similar'ish things for TI parts (we only register what we're > booting from). > > So, before this can be applied don't we also need a patch for mx6slevk > and for TI ones too (but that should be "easier" since I think it > just becomes we always use the normal board_mmc_init) ? We don't **need** a patch to support existing use cases because the patch uses the dev number in the block device directly (mmc->block_dev.dev). https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/553026/ I'm not sure about TI boards, but the i.MX6SL EVK code swaps the non-SPL ordering of mmc devices when compiled for SPL in order to handle the hard-coded zero: http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c;hb=HEAD#l195 In other words, "mmc 0" becomes "mmc 1" and vice versa. The trouble with this approach is that you can't allow for multiple MMC devices through board_boot_order, because the second will be device number 1. Regards, Eric
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 12:32:28PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote: > In order to support boot from multiple devices through board_boot_order, > it's necessary to use the block number of a device. > > The use of a hard-coded 0 for the device number also creates a need > to re-order block devices for use in SPL like this: > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c;hb=HEAD#l195 > > Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <eric@nelint.com> Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
diff --git a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c index b3c2c64..cc97e47 100644 --- a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c +++ b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c @@ -23,12 +23,13 @@ static int mmc_load_image_raw_sector(struct mmc *mmc, unsigned long sector) unsigned long count; u32 image_size_sectors; struct image_header *header; + int dev_num = mmc->block_dev.dev; header = (struct image_header *)(CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE - sizeof(struct image_header)); /* read image header to find the image size & load address */ - count = mmc->block_dev.block_read(0, sector, 1, header); + count = mmc->block_dev.block_read(dev_num, sector, 1, header); debug("read sector %lx, count=%lu\n", sector, count); if (count == 0) goto end; @@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ static int mmc_load_image_raw_sector(struct mmc *mmc, unsigned long sector) mmc->read_bl_len; /* Read the header too to avoid extra memcpy */ - count = mmc->block_dev.block_read(0, sector, image_size_sectors, + count = mmc->block_dev.block_read(dev_num, sector, image_size_sectors, (void *)(ulong)spl_image.load_addr); debug("read %x sectors to %x\n", image_size_sectors, spl_image.load_addr); @@ -172,7 +173,8 @@ static int mmc_load_image_raw_os(struct mmc *mmc) { unsigned long count; - count = mmc->block_dev.block_read(0, + count = mmc->block_dev.block_read( + mmc->block_dev.dev, CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_ARGS_SECTOR, CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_ARGS_SECTORS, (void *) CONFIG_SYS_SPL_ARGS_ADDR);
In order to support boot from multiple devices through board_boot_order, it's necessary to use the block number of a device. The use of a hard-coded 0 for the device number also creates a need to re-order block devices for use in SPL like this: http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=board/freescale/mx6slevk/mx6slevk.c;hb=HEAD#l195 Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson <eric@nelint.com> --- common/spl/spl_mmc.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)