Message ID | 1269955441-20729-1-git-send-email-sjayaraman@suse.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:54:01 +0530 Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> wrote: > By doing this we always overwrite nbytes value that is being passed on to > CIFSSMBWrite() and need not rely on the callers to initialize. CIFSSMBWrite2 is > doing this already. > > Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> > --- > fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c > index 7cc7f83..e1f90a3 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c > @@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, > __u32 bytes_sent; > __u16 byte_count; > > + *nbytes = 0; > + > /* cFYI(1, ("write at %lld %d bytes", offset, count));*/ > if (tcon->ses == NULL) > return -ECONNABORTED; > @@ -1512,7 +1514,6 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, > cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->num_writes); > if (rc) { > cFYI(1, ("Send error in write = %d", rc)); > - *nbytes = 0; > } else { > *nbytes = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->CountHigh); > *nbytes = (*nbytes) << 16; > _______________________________________________ > linux-cifs-client mailing list > linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
This looks like we want to push it upstream ASAP - any objections? On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:54:01 +0530 > Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> wrote: > >> By doing this we always overwrite nbytes value that is being passed on to >> CIFSSMBWrite() and need not rely on the callers to initialize. CIFSSMBWrite2 is >> doing this already. >> >> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> >> --- >> fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 3 ++- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c >> index 7cc7f83..e1f90a3 100644 >> --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c >> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c >> @@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, >> __u32 bytes_sent; >> __u16 byte_count; >> >> + *nbytes = 0; >> + >> /* cFYI(1, ("write at %lld %d bytes", offset, count));*/ >> if (tcon->ses == NULL) >> return -ECONNABORTED; >> @@ -1512,7 +1514,6 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, >> cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->num_writes); >> if (rc) { >> cFYI(1, ("Send error in write = %d", rc)); >> - *nbytes = 0; >> } else { >> *nbytes = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->CountHigh); >> *nbytes = (*nbytes) << 16; >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-cifs-client mailing list >> linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org >> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client >> > > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> >
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:25:39 -0500 Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote: > This looks like we want to push it upstream ASAP - any objections? > No objections. It's a straightforward bugfix. Maybe even reasonable for stable. > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:54:01 +0530 > > Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> wrote: > > > >> By doing this we always overwrite nbytes value that is being passed on to > >> CIFSSMBWrite() and need not rely on the callers to initialize. CIFSSMBWrite2 is > >> doing this already. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> > >> --- > >> fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 3 ++- > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c > >> index 7cc7f83..e1f90a3 100644 > >> --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c > >> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c > >> @@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, > >> __u32 bytes_sent; > >> __u16 byte_count; > >> > >> + *nbytes = 0; > >> + > >> /* cFYI(1, ("write at %lld %d bytes", offset, count));*/ > >> if (tcon->ses == NULL) > >> return -ECONNABORTED; > >> @@ -1512,7 +1514,6 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, > >> cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->num_writes); > >> if (rc) { > >> cFYI(1, ("Send error in write = %d", rc)); > >> - *nbytes = 0; > >> } else { > >> *nbytes = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->CountHigh); > >> *nbytes = (*nbytes) << 16; > >> _______________________________________________ > >> linux-cifs-client mailing list > >> linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org > >> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client > >> > > > > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> > > > > >
nitpicking, we probably do not need braces around if check then. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:25:39 -0500 > Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This looks like we want to push it upstream ASAP - any objections? >> > > No objections. It's a straightforward bugfix. Maybe even reasonable for > stable. > >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:54:01 +0530 >> > Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> wrote: >> > >> >> By doing this we always overwrite nbytes value that is being passed on to >> >> CIFSSMBWrite() and need not rely on the callers to initialize. CIFSSMBWrite2 is >> >> doing this already. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> >> >> --- >> >> fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 3 ++- >> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c >> >> index 7cc7f83..e1f90a3 100644 >> >> --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c >> >> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c >> >> @@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, >> >> __u32 bytes_sent; >> >> __u16 byte_count; >> >> >> >> + *nbytes = 0; >> >> + >> >> /* cFYI(1, ("write at %lld %d bytes", offset, count));*/ >> >> if (tcon->ses == NULL) >> >> return -ECONNABORTED; >> >> @@ -1512,7 +1514,6 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, >> >> cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->num_writes); >> >> if (rc) { >> >> cFYI(1, ("Send error in write = %d", rc)); >> >> - *nbytes = 0; >> >> } else { >> >> *nbytes = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->CountHigh); >> >> *nbytes = (*nbytes) << 16; >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> linux-cifs-client mailing list >> >> linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org >> >> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client >> >> >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> >> > >> >> >> > > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> > _______________________________________________ > linux-cifs-client mailing list > linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client >
On 03/30/2010 08:58 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote: > nitpicking, we probably do not need braces around if check then. Good catch, removed the unnecessary brace. Not sure why checkpatch.pl didn't catch this. > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:25:39 -0500 >> Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This looks like we want to push it upstream ASAP - any objections? >>> >> >> No objections. It's a straightforward bugfix. Maybe even reasonable for >> stable. >> >>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:54:01 +0530 >>>> Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> By doing this we always overwrite nbytes value that is being passed on to >>>>> CIFSSMBWrite() and need not rely on the callers to initialize. CIFSSMBWrite2 is >>>>> doing this already. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> >>>>> --- >>>>> �fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | � �3 ++- >>>>> �1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c >>>>> index 7cc7f83..e1f90a3 100644 >>>>> --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c >>>>> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c >>>>> @@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, >>>>> � � � __u32 bytes_sent; >>>>> � � � __u16 byte_count; >>>>> >>>>> + � � *nbytes = 0; >>>>> + >>>>> � � � /* cFYI(1, ("write at %lld %d bytes", offset, count));*/ >>>>> � � � if (tcon->ses == NULL) >>>>> � � � � � � � return -ECONNABORTED; >>>>> @@ -1512,7 +1514,6 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, >>>>> � � � cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->num_writes); >>>>> � � � if (rc) { >>>>> � � � � � � � cFYI(1, ("Send error in write = %d", rc)); >>>>> - � � � � � � *nbytes = 0; >>>>> � � � } else { >>>>> � � � � � � � *nbytes = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->CountHigh); >>>>> � � � � � � � *nbytes = (*nbytes) << 16; >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> linux-cifs-client mailing list >>>>> linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org >>>>> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client >>>>> >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-cifs-client mailing list >> linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org >> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client >> > _______________________________________________ > linux-cifs-client mailing list > linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c index 7cc7f83..e1f90a3 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c @@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, __u32 bytes_sent; __u16 byte_count; + *nbytes = 0; + /* cFYI(1, ("write at %lld %d bytes", offset, count));*/ if (tcon->ses == NULL) return -ECONNABORTED; @@ -1512,7 +1514,6 @@ CIFSSMBWrite(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, cifs_stats_inc(&tcon->num_writes); if (rc) { cFYI(1, ("Send error in write = %d", rc)); - *nbytes = 0; } else { *nbytes = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->CountHigh); *nbytes = (*nbytes) << 16;
By doing this we always overwrite nbytes value that is being passed on to CIFSSMBWrite() and need not rely on the callers to initialize. CIFSSMBWrite2 is doing this already. Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> --- fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)