diff mbox

Use GET_MODE_BITSIZE to get vector natural alignment

Message ID 20151016174255.GA24528@intel.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

H.J. Lu Oct. 16, 2015, 5:42 p.m. UTC
Since GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT is defined by psABI and the biggest alignment
is 4 byte for IA MCU psABI, we should use GET_MODE_BITSIZE to get
vector natural alignment to check misaligned vector move.

OK for trunk?

Thanks.

H.J.
---
	* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_vector_move): Use
	GET_MODE_BITSIZE to get vector natural alignment.
---
 gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Uros Bizjak Oct. 19, 2015, 11:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:42 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
> Since GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT is defined by psABI and the biggest alignment
> is 4 byte for IA MCU psABI, we should use GET_MODE_BITSIZE to get
> vector natural alignment to check misaligned vector move.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks.
>
> H.J.
> ---
>         * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_vector_move): Use
>         GET_MODE_BITSIZE to get vector natural alignment.
> ---
>  gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> index ebe2b0a..d0e1f4c 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> @@ -18650,7 +18650,9 @@ void
>  ix86_expand_vector_move (machine_mode mode, rtx operands[])
>  {
>    rtx op0 = operands[0], op1 = operands[1];
> -  unsigned int align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode);
> +  /* Use GET_MODE_BITSIZE instead of GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT since the
> +     biggest alignment is 4 byte for IA MCU psABI.  */
> +  unsigned int align = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode);

How about using TARGET_IAMCU condition here and using bitsize only for
TARGET_IAMCU?

Uros.

>    if (push_operand (op0, VOIDmode))
>      op0 = emit_move_resolve_push (mode, op0);
> --
> 2.4.3
>
H.J. Lu Oct. 19, 2015, 11:12 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:42 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>> Since GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT is defined by psABI and the biggest alignment
>> is 4 byte for IA MCU psABI, we should use GET_MODE_BITSIZE to get
>> vector natural alignment to check misaligned vector move.
>>
>> OK for trunk?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> H.J.
>> ---
>>         * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_vector_move): Use
>>         GET_MODE_BITSIZE to get vector natural alignment.
>> ---
>>  gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
>> index ebe2b0a..d0e1f4c 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
>> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
>> @@ -18650,7 +18650,9 @@ void
>>  ix86_expand_vector_move (machine_mode mode, rtx operands[])
>>  {
>>    rtx op0 = operands[0], op1 = operands[1];
>> -  unsigned int align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode);
>> +  /* Use GET_MODE_BITSIZE instead of GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT since the
>> +     biggest alignment is 4 byte for IA MCU psABI.  */
>> +  unsigned int align = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode);
>
> How about using TARGET_IAMCU condition here and using bitsize only for
> TARGET_IAMCU?
>

Works for me.  Is it OK with that change?
Uros Bizjak Oct. 19, 2015, 11:12 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:12 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:42 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Since GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT is defined by psABI and the biggest alignment
>>> is 4 byte for IA MCU psABI, we should use GET_MODE_BITSIZE to get
>>> vector natural alignment to check misaligned vector move.
>>>
>>> OK for trunk?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> H.J.
>>> ---
>>>         * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_vector_move): Use
>>>         GET_MODE_BITSIZE to get vector natural alignment.
>>> ---
>>>  gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 4 +++-
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
>>> index ebe2b0a..d0e1f4c 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
>>> @@ -18650,7 +18650,9 @@ void
>>>  ix86_expand_vector_move (machine_mode mode, rtx operands[])
>>>  {
>>>    rtx op0 = operands[0], op1 = operands[1];
>>> -  unsigned int align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode);
>>> +  /* Use GET_MODE_BITSIZE instead of GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT since the
>>> +     biggest alignment is 4 byte for IA MCU psABI.  */
>>> +  unsigned int align = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode);
>>
>> How about using TARGET_IAMCU condition here and using bitsize only for
>> TARGET_IAMCU?
>>
>
> Works for me.  Is it OK with that change?

Yes.

Thanks,
Uros.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index ebe2b0a..d0e1f4c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -18650,7 +18650,9 @@  void
 ix86_expand_vector_move (machine_mode mode, rtx operands[])
 {
   rtx op0 = operands[0], op1 = operands[1];
-  unsigned int align = GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode);
+  /* Use GET_MODE_BITSIZE instead of GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT since the
+     biggest alignment is 4 byte for IA MCU psABI.  */
+  unsigned int align = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode);
 
   if (push_operand (op0, VOIDmode))
     op0 = emit_move_resolve_push (mode, op0);