| Message ID | 1432892326-10261-2-git-send-email-angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
Dear Angelo Compagnucci, On Fri, 29 May 2015 11:38:44 +0200, Angelo Compagnucci wrote: > This patch adds licensing informations to at91bootstrap3 > > Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com> > --- > boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk b/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk > index ff49e14..2164a74 100644 > --- a/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk > +++ b/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ > > AT91BOOTSTRAP3_VERSION = v3.7.1 > AT91BOOTSTRAP3_SITE = $(call github,linux4sam,at91bootstrap,$(AT91BOOTSTRAP3_VERSION)) > +AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE = BSD-2c > +AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE_FILES = main.c I *think* it is actually closer to a BSD-3c, since it has the following text: * Atmel's name may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from * this software without specific prior written permission. However, the wording is not 100% the one of the BSD-3c, so I'm not sure if we should call it BSD-3c or not. Thomas
Dear Thomas Petazzoni, 2015-05-31 10:43 GMT+02:00 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>: > Dear Angelo Compagnucci, > > On Fri, 29 May 2015 11:38:44 +0200, Angelo Compagnucci wrote: >> This patch adds licensing informations to at91bootstrap3 >> >> Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com> >> --- >> boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk b/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk >> index ff49e14..2164a74 100644 >> --- a/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk >> +++ b/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk >> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ >> >> AT91BOOTSTRAP3_VERSION = v3.7.1 >> AT91BOOTSTRAP3_SITE = $(call github,linux4sam,at91bootstrap,$(AT91BOOTSTRAP3_VERSION)) >> +AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE = BSD-2c >> +AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE_FILES = main.c > > I *think* it is actually closer to a BSD-3c, since it has the following > text: > > * Atmel's name may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from > * this software without specific prior written permission. > > However, the wording is not 100% the one of the BSD-3c, so I'm not sure > if we should call it BSD-3c or not. Probably you are right, the wording is more similar to a BSD-3c instead of a BSD-2c, but it's different. Can we use something like BSD-custom or BSD-modified? Sincerely, Angelo > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com
On 06/01/15 18:03, Angelo Compagnucci wrote: > Dear Thomas Petazzoni, > > 2015-05-31 10:43 GMT+02:00 Thomas Petazzoni > <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>: >> Dear Angelo Compagnucci, >> >> On Fri, 29 May 2015 11:38:44 +0200, Angelo Compagnucci wrote: >>> This patch adds licensing informations to at91bootstrap3 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk | 2 ++ >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk b/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk >>> index ff49e14..2164a74 100644 >>> --- a/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk >>> +++ b/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk >>> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ >>> >>> AT91BOOTSTRAP3_VERSION = v3.7.1 >>> AT91BOOTSTRAP3_SITE = $(call github,linux4sam,at91bootstrap,$(AT91BOOTSTRAP3_VERSION)) >>> +AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE = BSD-2c >>> +AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE_FILES = main.c >> >> I *think* it is actually closer to a BSD-3c, since it has the following >> text: >> >> * Atmel's name may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from >> * this software without specific prior written permission. >> >> However, the wording is not 100% the one of the BSD-3c, so I'm not sure >> if we should call it BSD-3c or not. > > Probably you are right, the wording is more similar to a BSD-3c > instead of a BSD-2c, but it's different. Can we use something like > BSD-custom or BSD-modified? I would say BSD-2c with endorsement clause That's still relatively short but also clear. Regards, Arnout
diff --git a/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk b/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk index ff49e14..2164a74 100644 --- a/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk +++ b/boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ AT91BOOTSTRAP3_VERSION = v3.7.1 AT91BOOTSTRAP3_SITE = $(call github,linux4sam,at91bootstrap,$(AT91BOOTSTRAP3_VERSION)) +AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE = BSD-2c +AT91BOOTSTRAP3_LICENSE_FILES = main.c AT91BOOTSTRAP3_INSTALL_IMAGES = YES AT91BOOTSTRAP3_INSTALL_TARGET = NO
This patch adds licensing informations to at91bootstrap3 Signed-off-by: Angelo Compagnucci <angelo.compagnucci@gmail.com> --- boot/at91bootstrap3/at91bootstrap3.mk | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)